Search for: All records

This study investigates the impact of the lower‐thermospheric winter‐to‐summer circulation on the thermosphere's thermal structure and meridional circulation. Using NCAR TIE‐GCM, we compare simulations with and without the lower‐thermospheric circulation, finding that its inclusion enhances summer‐to‐winter thermospheric circulation by 40% in the summer hemisphere but decelerates it in the winter thermosphere. Meanwhile, vertical wind exhibits stronger upward motion ±30 degree latitude above 10e−6 hPa (174 km) when lower‐thermospheric circulation is incorporated. This dynamic coupling functions as an atmospheric “gear mechanism,” accelerating momentum and energy transfer to higher altitudes. Including lower‐thermospheric circulation improves agreement between the nudged run and NRLMSIS 2.1 in intra‐annual variability (IAV) of mass density. This suggests lower‐thermospheric circulation is a key factor in modulating IAV in the coupled thermosphere‐ionosphere system. This study reveals a new coupling mechanism between the lower atmosphere, thermosphere, and ionosphere, with significant implications for understanding upper‐atmospheric dynamics and improving space weather models. 

Abstract Penetrating and disturbed electric fields develop during geomagnetic storms and are effective in driving remarkable changes in the nightside low latitude ionosphere over varying time periods. While the former arrive nearly instantaneously with the changes in the solar wind electric field, the latter take more time, requiring auroral heating to modify upper atmospheric winds globally, leading to changes in the thermospheric wind dynamo away from the auroral zones. Such changes always differ from the quiet time state where the winds are usually patterned after daytime solar heating. We use the Multiscale Atmosphere‐Geospace Environment model (MAGE) and observations from the NASA Ionospheric Connection Explorer (ICON) mission to investigate both during the 7–8 July 2022 geomagnetic storm event. The model was able to simulate the penetrating and disturbed electric fields. The simulations showed enhanced westward winds and the wind dynamo induced upward ion drift confirmed by the ICON zonal wind and ion drift observations. The simulated zonal wind variations are slightly later in arrival at the low latitudes. We also see the penetrating electric field opposes or cancels the disturbed electric field in the MAGE simulation. 

Abstract The Global‐scale Observations of Limb and Disk (GOLD) and Sounding of the Atmosphere using Broadband Emission Radiometry (SABER) instruments were used to investigate the thermospheric composition and temperature responses to the geomagnetic storm on 23–24 April, 2023. Global‐scale Observations of Limb and Disk observed a faster recovery of thermospheric column density ratio of O to N₂(ΣO/N₂) in the southern hemisphere (SH) after the storm ended at 12 Universal time (UT) on 24 April. After 12 UT on 25 April, ΣO/N₂had mostly recovered in both hemispheres. Global‐scale Observations of Limb and Disk also observed an increase of middle thermospheric temperature (140–200 km) (Tdisk) on 24 April with a maximum of 340 K. Within 4–6 hr of the storm ending on 24 April, Tdisk enhancement persisted between 30°N and 60°N, 100°W and 30°W, while Tdisk lower than pre‐storm quiet day (17 April) was observed between 45°W and 15°W, 40°S and 50°N. Tdisk recovered between 100°W and 45°W, 30°N and 55°S. On 25 April, Tdisk was lower than on 17 April across the entire GOLD Field‐of‐Regard (FOR) by ∼50–110 K. Additionally, solar irradiance decreased by 15%–20% from 17 to 25 April, indicating that the lower Tdisk on 25 April resulted from both storm and solar irradiance variations. Latitudinal variations of Tdisk and the SABER observed Nitric Oxide (NO) cooling rate revealed that NO cooling is crucial for the lower Tdisk in the northern hemisphere (NH) mid‐high latitudes on 25 April. These results provide direct evidence of decreased thermospheric temperature during storm recovery phase than pre‐storm quiet times. 

Abstract Ultra‐low‐frequency (ULF) waves cause local Thermosphere‐Ionosphere (T‐I) perturbations, but their impacts on the global T‐I system including the generation of Traveling Atmospheric Disturbances (TADs) have never been evaluated. The mechanisms responsible for the TAD generation and propagation, whether through dynamic or thermal process, are not clear either. We present a model study of ULF wave impacts on the thermosphere using the Thermosphere‐Ionosphere‐Electrodynamics General Circulation Model. The model results indicate that ULF waves can trigger globally propagating TADs at ∼810 m/s. Thermal processes are the main driver for the TAD generation and propagation, with Joule heating and adiabatic processes taking effects inside the TAD source region, and adiabatic processes and heat conduction being the dominant processes outside. Model results also show that TAD propagation is almost independent of seasonal effects. This study reveals the physical connections between magnetospheric ULF waves and thermospheric disturbances for the first time. 

Abstract Ultra low frequency (ULF; 1 mHz ‐ several Hz) waves are key to energy transport within the geospace system, yet their contribution to Joule heating in the upper atmosphere remains poorly quantified. This study statistically examines Joule heating associated with ionospheric ULF perturbations using Super Dual Auroral Radar Network (SuperDARN) data spanning middle to polar latitudes. Our analysis utilizes high‐time‐resolution measurements from SuperDARN high‐frequency coherent scatter radars operating in a special mode, sampling three “camping beams” approximately every 18 s. We focus on ULF perturbations within the Pc5 frequency range (1.6–6.7 mHz), estimating Joule heating rates from ionospheric electric fields derived from SuperDARN data and height‐integrated Pedersen conductance from empirical models. The analysis includes statistical characterization of Pc5 wave occurrence, electric fields, Joule heating rates, and azimuthal wave numbers. Our results reveal enhanced electric fields and Joule heating rates in the morning and pre‐midnight sectors, even though Pc5 wave occurrences peak in the afternoon. Joule heating is more pronounced in the high‐latitude morning sector during northward interplanetary magnetic field conditions, attributed to local time asymmetry in Pedersen conductance and Pc5 waves driven by Kelvin‐Helmholtz instability. Pc5 waves observed by multiple camping beams predominantly propagate westward at low azimuthal wave numbers , while high‐m waves propagate mainly eastward. Although Joule heating estimates may be underestimated due to assumptions about empirical conductance models and the underestimation of electric fields resulting from SuperDARN line‐of‐sight velocity measurements, these findings offer valuable insights into ULF wave‐related energy dissipation in the geospace system. 

Abstract Using the latest coupled geospace model Multiscale Atmosphere‐Geospace Environment (MAGE) and observations from Jicamarca Incoherent scatter radar (ISR) and ICON ion velocity meter (IVM) instrument, we examine the pre‐reversal enhancement (PRE) during geomagnetic quiet time period. The MAGE shows comparable PRE to both the Jicamarca ISR and ICON observations. There appears to be a discrepancy between the Jicamarca ISR and ICON IVM with the later showed PRE about two times larger (∼40 m/s). This is the first time that MAGE is used to simulate the PRE. The results show that the MAGE can simulate the PRE well and are mostly consistent with observations. 

We simulated the Nov 3-4, 2021 geomagnetic storm event penetrating electric field using the Multiscale Atmosphere-Geospace Environment (MAGE) model and compared with the NASA ICON observation. The ICON observation showed sudden enhancement of the vertical ion drift when the penetrating electric field arrived at the equatorial region. The MAGE model simulated vertical ion drifts have the similarly fast enhancement that shown in the ICON data at the same UT time and satellite location. Hence, ICON ion drift data was able to verify MAGE simulation, which couples the magnetospheric model was able to simulate the penetrating electric field very well. 

Abstract Using NASA's Global‐scale Observations of the Limb and Disk (GOLD) imager, we report nightside ionospheric changes during the G5 super geomagnetic storm of 10 and 11 May 2024. Specifically, the nightside southern crest of the Equatorial Ionization Anomaly (EIA) was observed to merge with the aurora near the southern tip of South America. During the storm, the EIA southern crest was seen moving poleward as fast as 450 m/s. Furthermore, the aurora extended to mid‐latitudes reaching the southern tips of Africa and South America. The poleward shift of the equatorial ionospheric structure and equatorward motion of the aurora means there was no mid‐latitude ionosphere in this region. These observations offer unique insights into the ionospheric response to extreme geomagnetic disturbances, highlighting the complex interplay between solar activity and Earth's upper atmosphere. 

A new version of the US National Science Foundation National Center forAtmospheric Research (NSF NCAR) thermosphere-ionosphere-electrodynamicsgeneral circulation model (TIEGCM) has been developed and released. Thispaper describes the changes and improvements of the new version 3.0since its last major release (2.0) in 2016. These include: 1) increasingthe model resolution in both the horizontal and vertical dimensions, aswell as the ionospheric dynamo solver; 2) upward extension of the modelupper boundary to enable more accurate simulations of the topsideionosphere and neutral density in the lower exosphere; 3) improvedparameterization for thermal electron heating rate; 4) resolvingtransport of minor species N(2D); 5) treating helium as a major species;6) parameterization for additional physical processes, such as SAPS andelectrojet turbulent heating; 7) including parallel ion drag in theneutral momentum equation; 8) nudging of prognostic fields near thelower boundary from external data; 9) modification to the NO reactionrate and auroral heating rate; 10) outputs of diagnostic analysis termsof the equations; 11) new functionalities enabling model simulations ofcertain recurrent phenomena, such as solar flares and eclipse. Wepresent examples of the model validation during a moderate storm andcompare simulation results by turning on/off new functionalities todemonstrate the related new model capabilities. Furthermore, the modelis upgraded to comply with the new computer software environment at NSFNCAR for easy installation and run setup and with new visualizationtools. Finally, the model limitations and future development plans arediscussed.